Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> wrote: > And, revising the files before Worg updates the Org-mode it uses will > break them, right?
Yup - they got to be done at the same time. Nick > > Tom > > Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > > > I'm trying to add a note to Worg hacks but before I push, I use my local > > org setup to publish Worg locally and take a look at it (not entirely > > reliable > > since my org version is usually different from the real Worg one, but a > > good indication of problems before they happen nevertheless). I ran into > > a couple of problems. > > > > The first one is expected: I'm running with Eric's patch, so when > > processing Worg/org-contrib/babel/examples/o18.org (Tom Dye's article on > > Archaelogy in Oceania), I ran into #+srcname vs #+name problems: when > > Eric's changes do go into org and the new org is used to publish Worg, > > there is going to be some breakage. Actually, o18.org is the extent of > > breakage that I saw, so it doesn't look too bad. > > > > But I also ran into a second (unrelated) issue. Here's a minimal example: > > > > * Conclusion > > > > #+begin_src latex > > > > #+end_src > > > > Exporting to html gives me the attached backtrace. But the underlying reason > > is easy to demonstrate: if you C-c C-c on the empty source block, you get: > > > > ,---- > > | * Conclusion > > | > > | #+begin_src latex > > | > > | #+end_src > > | > > | #+results: > > | #+END_LaTeX > > | #+BEGIN_LaTeX > > `---- > > > > Nick > > > > Versions: > > Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.485.gcfed6.dirty) > > GNU Emacs 24.0.90.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.22.0) of > > 2011-10-27 > > > > > > > > -- > Thomas S. Dye > http://www.tsdye.com >
