> > However, I'd like to ask, what happens, if one refers to a > > name of a source block where data is expected, does it then refer to > > the results produced by that source block? How are such situations > > handeled at the moment? > > Try it out, but be ready to press C-g, because I would guess that it > results in an infinite loop.
Isn't it possible to refer to the results of a code block as input data for another? I thought it was. If not currently then at least I suppose that it will be in the future. The new syntax should be ready for that. Daniel
