Does org have TAB completion in "call lines" for names of blocks that can be called? Using "srcname" for blocks of code could make things easier but if this is not the case then I "name" is just fine.
-- Darlan At Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:37:13 +0100, Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > > Daniel Bausch <danielbau...@gmx.de> writes: > > > Hi, > > > >> named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function" > >> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob" > >> named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data" > > > > what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ? > > > > That a table or list contains data is obvious. The only thing, the > > additional > > line is for, is to "name" it. That a source block contains source is also > > obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate > > the > > "src"-part? > > > > Daniel > > I don't know if I've left it too late to vote on this but... > > I would go for "name" for [1] and [3] and "call" for [2]. > > I can, however, see the need for distinguishing between data tables and > results so could be convinced that "data" and "results" should be used > for [3]. In any case, I do know that I dislike srcname and tblname... > > -- > : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.90.1 > : using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.452.g767f5) >
