Hello, Jambunathan K <kjambunat...@gmail.com> writes:
> The problem persists. You can put the exported html file in nxml-mode > and do a C-c C-n to find the validation errors. The problem is different now. > I am attaching the two examples and the problematic html segment (marked > with VALIDATION ERROR) here. Note that one of the examples has a list in > the inline task. > > > > #+begin_src nxml > <pre class="inlinetask"><b>Detector effects</b><br /> > <ol> <!-- VALIDATION ERROR HERE: Element not allowed in this context --> > <li>How is the Gaussian used for smearing of proper time resolution > derived? <a href="http://www.google.com";>Google</a> this. > </li> > <li>Why is the proper time error PDF needed? Why is > smearing of time resolution not enough? > </li> > </ol> > #+end_src > > #+begin_src nxml > <div id="outline-container-1" class="outline-2"> > <h2 id="sec-1"><span class="section-number-2">1</span> B oscillations </h2> > <div class="outline-text-2" id="text-1"> > > <p>This is Suvayu's example but simplified. Also see the annotation > within the inline task itself. > </p> > <p> > <span style="text-decoration:underline;">Questions</span>: > </p> > > > <pre class="inlinetask"><b>Detector effects</b><br /> > <p> <!-- VALIDATION ERROR: Element not allowed in this context --> > Suvayu's example uses lists within inline task. Can the html export > engine produce valid html when the inline task has lists. But honestly > why does a preformatted text looks like a well-formatted html > list. Isn't that strange. Just uncomment the below list and see for > yourself. > </pre> <!-- VALIDATION ERROR: Missing end-tag "p" --> > > </p></div> <!-- VALIDATION ERROR: Mismatched end-tag --> > </div> > #+end_src I see. Contents of inline tasks are meant to be interpreted during export. Thus, paragraphs will be marked as <p>, lists as <ul> or whatever... This isn't compatible with the default <pre> tag provided. I can see two possibilities. Come up with a better default value, or provide a way to tell to template that contents will be verbatim (or both). I prefer the first solution, but I can't think of something simple, yet elegant enough, for that value. Do you have any suggestion? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
