* Michael Brand <michael.ch.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If it is a DEADLINE or SCHEDULED you can also use "C-c C-d ." or "C-c > C-s ." as a workaround to preserve the repeater. Therefore I consider > loosing the repeater with just "C-c ." on any active timestamp, no > matter if a DEADLINE, SCHEDULED or not, a bug.
Same to me. Unfortunately I am using timestamps not only in the context of DEADLINE or SCHEDULED but also for events that should simply show up on the agenda (without deadline or scheduled timestamp at all). To me this *is* a bug since my expected behavior of org-time-stamp to modify an existing timestamp is different. So, how reaches this bug report a person who is able to fix it? PS: Sorry, I still don't know ELISP yet and therefore can't fix it by myself. -- Karl Voit
