Hi! Maybe there is a (to me at least hidden) feature behind the behavior that org-time-stamp (C-c .) deletes any repeater information when used to update a date stamp.
Or is this some kind of bug or at least unexpected behavior? -- Karl Voit
Hi! Maybe there is a (to me at least hidden) feature behind the behavior that org-time-stamp (C-c .) deletes any repeater information when used to update a date stamp.
Or is this some kind of bug or at least unexpected behavior? -- Karl Voit