Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > On 7.5.2011, at 17:20, Bert Burgemeister wrote: > >> Matt Lundin <m...@imapmail.org> writes: >> >>> Bert Burgemeister <tre...@googlemail.com> writes: >>> >>>> Just curious, is there anything I should have known that prevented the >>>> patch submitted in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/39313, >>> >>> Is it still in the bugtracker, or was it rejected? >> >> Yes, and no. >> >>> With your patch, what would happen if there were two or more links in >>> the headline? >>> >>> * Two links >>> %%(format "%s" (concat "[[elisp:(info)]" "[Link to info]]")) >>> http://www.orgmode.org >>> >>> This entry would show up in the agenda as: >>> >>> org: [[elisp:(info)][Link to info]] >>> >>> But AFAICT, hitting C-c C-o in the agenda-buffer (even on the elisp >>> link) would jump immediately to http://www.orgmode.org, bypassing the >>> opportunity to select the the %%(...) generated link. >> >> That's true and your patch reduces org-mode's LOC, so you win. > > Hi Bert, > > does this mean > > http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/681/ > > is now obsolete?
It doesn't fix any issues I'm aware of, so you could consider it obsolete. But on the other hand, it still makes org-agenda-open-link a bit more robust as it makes the cond try the remaining clauses if the first one doesn't succeed. -- Bert
