On 7.5.2011, at 17:20, Bert Burgemeister wrote: > Matt Lundin <m...@imapmail.org> writes: > >> Bert Burgemeister <tre...@googlemail.com> writes: >> >>> Just curious, is there anything I should have known that prevented the >>> patch submitted in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/39313, >> >> Is it still in the bugtracker, or was it rejected? > > Yes, and no. > >> With your patch, what would happen if there were two or more links in >> the headline? >> >> * Two links >> %%(format "%s" (concat "[[elisp:(info)]" "[Link to info]]")) >> http://www.orgmode.org >> >> This entry would show up in the agenda as: >> >> org: [[elisp:(info)][Link to info]] >> >> But AFAICT, hitting C-c C-o in the agenda-buffer (even on the elisp >> link) would jump immediately to http://www.orgmode.org, bypassing the >> opportunity to select the the %%(...) generated link. > > That's true and your patch reduces org-mode's LOC, so you win.
Hi Bert, does this mean http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/681/ is now obsolete? Thanks. - Carsten > > -- > Bert > >
