On Mar 27, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Michael Brand wrote:
Yes, thinking more about it, I do agree that a fixed width makes a
lot of sense as the application of <N>. It does now work like this.
Thank you for changing. And if someone wants `maximum width' I hope
that it will be implemented with the syntax <..N> as a _variant_
_additional_ to the existing <N>.
No, I am now convinced that this is not at all needed. Fixed is best
and just fine.
Thanks!
- Carsten
Comparison of four variants (the last two rather useless apart from
showing the completeness of the syntax):
<30> : `fixed width' (the only variant implemented now)
<..40> : `maximum width' (as wide as necessary but max. 40)
<20..> : `minimum width' (as wide as necessary but min. 20)
<20..40> : `width range' (min. 20, then up to 40, narrow only if >
40)
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode