Christian Moe <m...@christianmoe.com> writes: > David Masterson <dsmaster...@icloud.com> writes: >>>> + Why is my "Outline" slide blank? Shouldn't it be picking up all the >>>> "H:1" headings? What am I missing? > > Testing: > > (1) With a one-level document > > #+begin_src org > ,#+title: Beamer test > ,#+STARTUP: beamer > ,#+LATEX_CLASS: beamer > ,#+OPTIONS: H:1 > > ,* Frame 1 > Content > ,* Frame 2 > Content > #+end_src > > > Expected result: An outine listing the two frames. > Result: Blank outline slide. > > (2) With a two-level document (other headers as above): > > #+begin_src org > ,#+OPTIONS: H:2 > > ,* Section 1 > ,** Frame 1 > Content > ,* Section 2 > ,** Frame 2 > Content > #+end_src > > Expected result: A two-level Outline slide listing Sections and Frames. > > Result: A one-level Outline slide with the Sections, but not the Frames. > > Inspecting the .tex shows that a =\tableofcontents= command is inserted. > It does not have the =hideallsubsections= option, so that isn't the > problem. Sections get =\section= commands inserted. The problem is that > frames do not get =\subsection=, and therefore are not picked up by the > Outline slide. Nor will the line > : #+TOC: headlines [currentsection] > insert them. > > I'm fairly happy with this result, really. > But what if I /want/ the full outline? > > (3) With a two-level document, same as above, but with H:3: > > Result: A two-level outline with both Sections and Frames listed. > Problem solved? No, because (as one might expect) this messes up the use > of third-level headings for Beamer blocks and columns, which become > separate frames. > > Something does seem wrong here.
Thanks for testing. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable will see. -- David Masterson
