We would forget unnumbered sections with alt_title…
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 23 feb 2025, a las 11:13, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> escribió:
>
> Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paag...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> ;; section... we need the brackets
>>> (let*
>>> ;; Replace square brackets with parenthesis
>>> ;; since square brackets are not supported in
>>> ;; optional arguments.
>>> ((un-bracketed-alt (replace-regexp-in-string
>>> "\\[" "("
>>> (replace-regexp-in-string "\\]" ")" opt-title)))
>>> (replacement-re (concat "\\1[" un-bracketed-alt
>>> "]")))
>>> (setq new-format (replace-match replacement-re nil nil
>>> section-fmt 1))))
>>>
>>> I am wondering if we can sompletely drop the part with using
>>> \sectionkwd[...]{...}
>>> and instead always use \addcontentsline. This way, we won't need to
>>> replace square brackets in the title. WDYT?
>>
>> No please… It would make no sense from a LaTeX point-of-view and someone with
>> LaTeX background make well think there is a bug… Let’s keep LaTeX output
>> LaTeX ;-)
>
> What about using \adcontentsline just for titles with square brackets inside?
>
> --
> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
> Org mode maintainer,
> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
