Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paag...@gmail.com> writes:
>> ;; section... we need the brackets
>> (let*
>> ;; Replace square brackets with parenthesis
>> ;; since square brackets are not supported in
>> ;; optional arguments.
>> ((un-bracketed-alt (replace-regexp-in-string
>> "\\[" "("
>> (replace-regexp-in-string "\\]" ")" opt-title)))
>> (replacement-re (concat "\\1[" un-bracketed-alt
>> "]")))
>> (setq new-format (replace-match replacement-re nil nil
>> section-fmt 1))))
>>
>> I am wondering if we can sompletely drop the part with using
>> \sectionkwd[...]{...}
>> and instead always use \addcontentsline. This way, we won't need to
>> replace square brackets in the title. WDYT?
>
> No please… It would make no sense from a LaTeX point-of-view and someone with
> LaTeX background make well think there is a bug… Let’s keep LaTeX output
> LaTeX ;-)
What about using \adcontentsline just for titles with square brackets inside?
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode maintainer,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
