Phil Estival <p...@7d.nz> writes: >> Does the attached diff fix the problem you are encountering? > > Yes it does. Thank you! > > But we are losing that previous possibility we had of a > bi-color display of meta lines, with the second part (past > the text of a meta line) being of the color of the block.
That's an accidental feature. Just happen to work. Historically, we always used org-fontifiy-whole-block-delimiter-line = t. It became optional to fontify the newline to avoid underline extending too far. See https://yhetil.org/emacs-bugs/83d0hd8ceh....@gnu.org/ Looking at that discussion, it seems that it happened before :extend t face attribute got introduced into Emacs. Maybe we can get along with letting users set :extend t/nil in the face itself and deprecating org-fontify-whole-block-delimiter-line. > Maybe we can simplify a little the fontification of that > area now by replacing org-fontify-whole-block-delimiter-line > with the respective extend attribute instead and introducing > an other variable. What do you mean by "introducing another variable"? > Line 5566 of org.el: > ;; Fontify the #+begin and #+end lines of the blocks. > > A quick reminder of the structure of a block to > understand what I'm saying next : > [[#+begin_src] [lang] [switches]][remainder of the line] > [block] > [#+end_src][remainder of the line] > > 1) Begin/end src have a face inheriting from org-meta-line. > They can extend all over the line. > 2) A block fontification starts on the next line of > a begin declaration. > 3) When a meta line is not extended, the remainder is either: > - not fontified (it has no text, it's a default face). > - or, optionally, it is fontified like a block. > This, without identifying if the block fontification > should starts right past the meta-line text or at eol, > but simply, when set and not extending, adding the > extra strike of marker along the line. > > => Introduces org-block-fontify-meta-line > (Non-nil means fontify past the text of begin/end > lines of blocks with the block face to give the > allure of a block covering those lines too.) > > Adding a face for the remainder of the line would also > achieve the same result and even more for the area aspects. So, you want [remainder of the line] to be fontified differently from the rest of the #+begin_src ...? > To me it's fine in the current state. My proposals are only > meant for someone who would observe the change differently. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
