Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > Björn Bidar <bjorn.bi...@thaodan.de> writes: > >>> May it be that `org-link-frame-setup' is configured by the user to use >>> current frame, but the user manually used gnus-other-frame and closed >>> the frame? In my mind, your patch then introduced unexpected behavior. >> >> The `org-link-frame-setup' introduced the first unexpected behavior I >> think since `org-gnus-follow-link' unconditionally uses the previously >> existing frame, going with that opening Gnus outside of the >> gnus-other-frame-object in the frame setup function would go against >> that. >> ... > > Ok. Looks like you know what you are doing :) > I am a bit lost in this global state managed by gnus.
I get it, I had my fare share of issues with it.. Gnus suffered to my neglect over the years so much todo :) > In any case, given your arguments, I think that your patch is ok. > However, please add ORG-NEWS entry announcing new custom option. OK will do.
