Hi Leo, I get the following output: #+RESULTS: #+begin_example (linenum:0, #+end_example
and from *messages*: Executing Maxima source code block maxima -r \(linenum\:0\,\ batchload\(\"/var/folders/f5/6nrph1812wdf0nlg4ddcs_580000gn/T/babel-wImUPJ/maxima-Swf2M2.max\"\)\)\$ --very-quiet Wrote /var/folders/f5/6nrph1812wdf0nlg4ddcs_580000gn/T/babel-wImUPJ/ob-input-Rbgtzp Code block evaluation complete (took 0.1s). The contents of that file (which I also attach) are: build_info(); If there's more information I can give, just let me know. Thanks, Benjamin On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 9:17 AM Leo Butler <leo.but...@umanitoba.ca> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09 2024, Leo Butler <leo.but...@umanitoba.ca> wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 08 2024, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: > > > >> Benjamin McMillan <mcmilla...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >>> This outputs > >>> #+RESULTS: > >>> | (linenum:0, | > >>> | 4 | > >>> > >>> I suppose the issue is the "linenum:0". In fact, running any of the > test > >>> src blocks does that, e.g. > >>> #+begin_src maxima :results verbatim :batch batch > >>> (assume(z>0), > >>> integrate(exp(-t)*t^z, t, 0, inf)); > >>> #+end_src > >>> > >>> #+RESULTS: > >>> #+begin_example > >>> (linenum:0, > >>> (assume(z > 0),integrate(exp(-t)*t^z,t,0,inf)) > >>> gamma(z + 1) > >>> #+end_example > >>> This does not match the (should (equal ...)) in test-ob-maxima.el > >>> > >>> I don't know maxima, and haven't made any explicit modifications > regards > >>> it, so I don't know why my setup would be outputting linenum:0 > > Benjamin, > When you execute your source code block, ob-maxima prints the shell > command as a message. Could you copy that shell command from *Messages* > and send it, along with the batch file that ob-maxima creates? > > Thanks, > Leo > > >> > >> Setting linenum was introduced in > >> https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/87jzsrai3x.fsf@localhost/ > >> > >> It clearly does not affect Linux, but Maxima on MacOS appears to have > >> slightly different behavior. > >> > >> I am CCing the author of the original patch that introduced this > setting. > >> Leo, maybe you have some insight? > >> > >> Unless we can do something to solve the problem on Mac, I am tentatively > >> inclined to revert the linenum part of the patch, so that ob-maxima is > >> not broken on MacOS. > > > > Benjamin, > > Could you include the output of > > > > #+begin_src maxima :results verbatim > > build_info(); > > #+end_src > > > > , please? I think the bug is in the Mac build of Maxima, but I need more > > information to figure it out. > > > > Best, > > Leo
maxima-dtnZ7x.max
Description: Binary data
