On Mon, Dec 09 2024, Leo Butler <leo.but...@umanitoba.ca> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08 2024, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: > >> Benjamin McMillan <mcmilla...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> This outputs >>> #+RESULTS: >>> | (linenum:0, | >>> | 4 | >>> >>> I suppose the issue is the "linenum:0". In fact, running any of the test >>> src blocks does that, e.g. >>> #+begin_src maxima :results verbatim :batch batch >>> (assume(z>0), >>> integrate(exp(-t)*t^z, t, 0, inf)); >>> #+end_src >>> >>> #+RESULTS: >>> #+begin_example >>> (linenum:0, >>> (assume(z > 0),integrate(exp(-t)*t^z,t,0,inf)) >>> gamma(z + 1) >>> #+end_example >>> This does not match the (should (equal ...)) in test-ob-maxima.el >>> >>> I don't know maxima, and haven't made any explicit modifications regards >>> it, so I don't know why my setup would be outputting linenum:0
Benjamin, When you execute your source code block, ob-maxima prints the shell command as a message. Could you copy that shell command from *Messages* and send it, along with the batch file that ob-maxima creates? Thanks, Leo >> >> Setting linenum was introduced in >> https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/87jzsrai3x.fsf@localhost/ >> >> It clearly does not affect Linux, but Maxima on MacOS appears to have >> slightly different behavior. >> >> I am CCing the author of the original patch that introduced this setting. >> Leo, maybe you have some insight? >> >> Unless we can do something to solve the problem on Mac, I am tentatively >> inclined to revert the linenum part of the patch, so that ob-maxima is >> not broken on MacOS. > > Benjamin, > Could you include the output of > > #+begin_src maxima :results verbatim > build_info(); > #+end_src > > , please? I think the bug is in the Mac build of Maxima, but I need more > information to figure it out. > > Best, > Leo
