On Sun, Dec 08 2024, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: > Benjamin McMillan <mcmilla...@gmail.com> writes: > >> This outputs >> #+RESULTS: >> | (linenum:0, | >> | 4 | >> >> I suppose the issue is the "linenum:0". In fact, running any of the test >> src blocks does that, e.g. >> #+begin_src maxima :results verbatim :batch batch >> (assume(z>0), >> integrate(exp(-t)*t^z, t, 0, inf)); >> #+end_src >> >> #+RESULTS: >> #+begin_example >> (linenum:0, >> (assume(z > 0),integrate(exp(-t)*t^z,t,0,inf)) >> gamma(z + 1) >> #+end_example >> This does not match the (should (equal ...)) in test-ob-maxima.el >> >> I don't know maxima, and haven't made any explicit modifications regards >> it, so I don't know why my setup would be outputting linenum:0 > > Setting linenum was introduced in > https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/87jzsrai3x.fsf@localhost/ > > It clearly does not affect Linux, but Maxima on MacOS appears to have > slightly different behavior. > > I am CCing the author of the original patch that introduced this setting. > Leo, maybe you have some insight? > > Unless we can do something to solve the problem on Mac, I am tentatively > inclined to revert the linenum part of the patch, so that ob-maxima is > not broken on MacOS.
Benjamin, Could you include the output of #+begin_src maxima :results verbatim build_info(); #+end_src , please? I think the bug is in the Mac build of Maxima, but I need more information to figure it out. Best, Leo
