Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> after reopening a file with two footnotes inside, >> inserting a third footnote between first and second, it >> fails to renumber it. >> >> below the test-buffer >> >> Should I'm right so far --even seeing footnote reimplemented-- maybe >> have a look at >> >> https://code.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/footnote-init.el >> >> >> https://code.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/GNU-Emacs-footnote.diff >> >> >> https://code.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/XEmacs-footnote.diff >> >> >> Thanks all >> >> >> Andreas Röhler > > Hi Andreas, > > you are the author of footnote-init.el, right? That was an important > fix for footnote.el to make it usable for more than one-off documents. >
Thanks. A hundred fold flowers back for writing org-node :) > Let me re-enforce a few things that have already come up here, > mainly in Matt's post. > > Org-mode started out using footnote.el, which I think is an > excellent package for its original purpose - footnotes in emails. > > But after a lengthy discussion here on the list which you can > find in the archive, I implemented a different mechanism. > > The main reasons were to allow for named footnotes and, most > importantly, inline footnotes. These are very helpful > when you are building documents using cut and paste, > which is where footnote.el fails. > Yes, inline footnotes seem very useful indeed. > Org did not implement automatic renumbering and sorting because > it makes less sense to do so if footnotes are inline, or named > and referenced multiple times. > IMHO renumbering should be able to cope with all this circumstances. With named footnotes "renumbering" might no longer be the appropriate term then... > I can see that, when using footnotes in an isolated > small document and automatic footnote lable generation, > automatic renumbering and sorting is indeed useful. > > In this case, you could fall back to footnote.el. > However, Org does internally have functions to sort > and renumber footnotes, so there is no reason why we could > not call them after generating or deleting a note. > Lets see ... OK, in the latest git version of Org, use > > (setq org-footnote-auto-adjust t) > My suggestion: Make it cope with inline, named and referenced multiple notes; then set it to t by default. > On a per-file basis you can also turn this on and off with > > #+STARTUP: fnadjust > #+STARTUP: nofnadjust > > HTH > > - Carsten > Thanks a lot caring for the issue. Andreas > > > > > > > >> >> -- >> https://code.launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/ >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/python-mode/python-mode.el/ >> >> GNU Emacs 23.0.94.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of >> 2009-05-25 >> >> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; >> >> asdfs [fn:1] >> [fnx:3] >> sdfs >> [fn:2] >> * Footnotes >> >> [fn:1] asdfs d >> >> [fn:2] xdddd >> >> [fn:3] dddd >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
