Hi, thx for your answer.
Sorry for my poor understanding of org-cite. I added
```
(require 'oc-natbib)
(setq org-cite-export-processors
'((latex natbib)
(t basic)))
```
to my init file and then it worked smoothly. I can even put
```
#+cite_export: natbib customstylefile.bst
```
in my org file to use an extraneous bibliography style file, which is pretty
nice.
A last question though: is it possible to set the 'round' option without having
to insert the latex header
```
#+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage[round]{natbib}
```
?
Thanks a lot for your work with org-cite.
Best,
M
------- Original Message -------
On Monday, June 27th, 2022 at 12:56 PM, Bruce D'Arcus <bdar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 1:13 AM M. Pger mp...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > I've recently tried to switch to org-cite, but I still have some problems
> > with the basics.
>
>
> First, org-cite is a framework for citations. When reporting issues
> related to it, you really need to identify what processor(s) you are
> seeing the behavior with.
>
> > Consider the following entry:
> >
> > @article{akey2022,
> > title = {This is the title},
> > shorttitle = {This is the short title},
> > author = {Surname1, Name1 and Surname2, Name2 and Surname3, Name3},
> > year = {2022},
> > (truncated)
> > }
> >
> > I want to have something like: "as shown by Surname1 et al. (2022), ...",
> > i.e. something one can get with natbib \citet command. With org-ref it
> > worked like a charm.
> >
> > I've tried the syntax presented in
> > https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-07-31-citations.html#more-exporting,
> > that is:
> > [cite/t/c:@akey2022]
> > but I ended with a 'wrong type argument' error.
> >
> > I then tried [cite/t:@akey2022]: exporting succeeds. However, I end up with
> > "as shown by Surname1, Name1 and Surname2, Name2 and Surname3, Name3
> > (2022), ...".
> >
> > How can I correctly specify the options mentioned above? Is there a
> > complete and updated tutorial available somewhere?
>
>
> [cite/t:@key] should work as you expect in natbib, biblatex, csl.
>
> Possible issues, depending on which of those you're using:
>
> - some error with the bib file; or a mismatch between the file and the
> bibtex dialect or something
> - the citation style
>
> A complete MWE would help.
>
> Bruce
