Arthur Miller <arthur.mil...@live.com> writes: > Hello again; I have been playing with this, and so far the biggest problem is > that I get too many ideas as longer I refactor the existing code :).
:) > However, I have a question: would it be acceptable for org-capture to change > the > input model? > > I have implemented more flexible replacement for org-mks, and refactored it > out > of org-mode under new nick 'quick-menu' to indicate that it does not pull any > of > org mode with it. I have one implementation based on "read-key" function from > org-macs and used in original org-mks. A proptotype works, but I am not done > completely. This sounds promising. > However before I continue, I am thinking of ditching the 'read-key' completely > and switching to "standard" Emacs way of implementing interactivity via mode > and > mode-map. I am currently playing with such implementation, which to me appears > both simpler (code reduction) and more flexible, but it does change the mental > model of how clients of org-mks are used, for example org-capture. > > I don't think it should be a deal-breaker, but that is my personal opinion, > so I > would like to hear if that change would be acceptable or not? Could you provide a bit more details? How exactly will the usage differ from read-key? Best, Ihor
