Dear All, On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 07:43, M. ‘quintus’ Gülker <post+orgmod...@guelker.eu> wrote:
> Das ist ein Test [cite:@saenger2013gsr § 12 Rn. 488]. > > gives: > > Saenger, Gesellschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl. (2013), §§ 12 Rn. 488 [...] > This is a little confusing. Maybe an error on my part? Do I need to > signal singular and plural use more explicitely? No, it's citeproc-el which is supposed to determine whether the passed locator string represents single vs multiple references, using § vs §§ shouldn't make a difference, because they simply signal that the label is "section". Apparently, citeproc-el's classifier algorithm doesn't handle some of your examples correctly -- could you open an issue about this on the project page? Thanks in advance! best wishes, András
