Am Dienstag, dem 12. Oktober 2021 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> I mapped both § and §§ to "section". Hopefully, the issue is now
> completely fixed.
Nearly :-). Thank you so much for your hard work so far! It is
incredible to see how this develops.
With »Org mode version 9.5 (release_9.5-104-g2b1fc6 @
/home/quintus/.emacs.d/org-mode/lisp/)«
now
Das ist ein Test [cite:@saenger2013gsr § 12 Rn. 488].
gives:
Saenger, Gesellschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl. (2013), §§ 12 Rn. 488
Positioning and choice of locator label is correct. The one thing left
is that it uses double §§ instead of a single §, that is, it treats the
citation as a plural one whereas it should be a singular one. The same
happens with
Das ist ein Test [cite:@saenger2013gsr section 12 Rn. 488].
Interestingly, the input
Das ist ein Test [cite:@saenger2013gsr § 12].
(which has no suffix) does export to
Saenger, Gesellschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl. (2013), § 12
with only one § sign. Then, a real multi-section citation like this:
Das ist ein Test [cite:@saenger2013gsr §§ 12 ff.].
instead yields a single §:
Saenger, Gesellschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl. (2013), § 12 ff.
This one however:
Das ist ein Test [cite:@saenger2013gsr §§ 12-14].
is correct again:
Saenger, Gesellschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl. (2013), §§ 12-14
This is a little confusing. Maybe an error on my part? Do I need to
signal singular and plural use more explicitely?
-quintus
--
Dipl.-Jur. M. Gülker | https://mg.guelker.eu | PGP: Siehe Webseite
Passau, Deutschland | [email protected] | O<
