On 16/11/2020 11:25, Eric S Fraga wrote: > Daniele, > > this looks good. One minor pedantic point: I think you mean > "interpreted" when you say "interpolated" (several times in the > text). Otherwise, this is a very useful addition to the manual.
Thank you for reading and for the comment. "interpolated" looks strange to me in this context too, but it is the word that is currently used in the manual. I decided to stick to this term for consistency, however, I haven't check if it is used with the same meaning elsewhere. I don't think it is wrong to use "interpolated", but if you thing it should be changed I can change it and check the manual for consistency. However, I don't think "interpreted" is the right word either. Probably "replaced" or "substituted" are better choices in this context. Cheers, Dan
