On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:32 AM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: > > "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes:
... > > So in other words, the value of an affix would be a trimmed string? > > That was a typo. But that's a good question anyway. > > Generally speaking, I'd rather avoid any magic, so the parser should not > add any space whatsoever. However, should it remove some? > > AFAICT, Biblatex would probably ignore spacing since it provides its own > mechanism to separate multiple cites. I don't know about Citeproc. Maybe > trimming prefixes and postfixes is the way to go. What would you suggest > here? In that case, since it was a typo, I would do as pandoc does: treat it as a string. The below syntax examples are more clear. > In any case, consecutive spaces ought to be packed into a single one. > This allows auto-filling a paragraph at a citation, e.g., > > Some very long explanation [cite:see @doe2020 > pp. 12-15]. > > is equivalent to > > Some very long explanation [cite:see @doe2020 pp. 12-15] That makes sense. Bruce
