Dear Michael, > BTW, what is the canonical place to report org-mode bugs? Emacs bug > reports are not (takes a long time until someone even notices) -- I > thought this list would be good...or is there a better place? @Adam > it's ok if you answer, though I'm a bit disappointed that no one else > seems to care so far...
You can try M-x org-submit-bug-report ;) Then it becomes clear that you are in the right place already. Best, Ihor Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerde...@web.de> writes: > Adam Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> writes: > >> I guess you're asking me, since I'm the only other person in this >> thread--but I'm not an Org maintainer, so my opinion isn't very >> important. IMO, the hooks are worth considering, however they should be >> done very, very carefully, because bad things can happen when functions >> called in kill hooks don't work as expected (e.g. they can make it very >> difficult to kill a buffer or the Emacs process, especially for an >> average user). > > Yes, all true. I didn't even check if the code I posted breaks any org > commands that kill the buffer. So far it's only meant for demonstration > (and my personal usage). > > Will my request be noticed here, or do you think I should report it to > some other place? > >> > BTW, what about my question whether my original bug report can be >> > closed? >> >> I haven't seen your bug report. Was there discussion about it >> previously? > > No, no discussion at all. As I said, it is Emacs bug #37890, this was > my issue: > > | I want to capture an APPT with `org-capture'. I the pop-up buffer to > | edit the item I move the date to the second line and add text after the > | date (personal preference). That loses the final newline in > | CAPTURE-todo.org. As a result, the headline of the item following the > | item to be inserted gets appended to the last line of the text: > | > | ** APPT Abc > | <2019-10-23 Mi> > | text... ** APPT 8:30 Important Appointment > | > | breaking the whole item. The user should somehow be prevented from that > | happening. > > It seems it has been resolved, just without noticing my bug report. If > you can confirm that the cited issue has been cared about, I'll close it > as done. > > BTW, what is the canonical place to report org-mode bugs? Emacs bug > reports are not (takes a long time until someone even notices) -- I > thought this list would be good...or is there a better place? @Adam > it's ok if you answer, though I'm a bit disappointed that no one else > seems to care so far... > > > Thanks, > > Michael. >
