Message: 2
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 19:24:12 +0200
From: Joseph Vidal-Rosset <joseph.vidal.ros...@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, John Kitchin
<jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu>, John Kitchin <johnrkitc...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [O] export to odt with LaTeX math formulae and tables
Message-ID:
<CAD-VTcE=+z+mlkm59razgcxluwdzyinomrnus_bsr-mv422...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello John, hello the list,
The results of my efforts to export an org file with equations, proofs
and
so on to odt: imagemagick works, but the png images are ugly.
References of
equations and bibliography do not work,
I have the same problem. So far, I can either get inter-text references
or external packages (depending on whether I use the export from Org or
Pandoc), but not both. I wonder if using an OTT would suffice to change
the size of all equations in the ODT (cannot test now; away from my
computer). If that is the case, there is an option to change the
configuration of imagemagick and dvipng when exporting from Org to ODT.
There, you can set the scale or resolution, I think. It makes the
pictures to look bigger, but if the OTT forces them to be smaller again,
I'm sure that they would look much better.
because the png images do not
reproduce the org-ref references.
I get the tags for the inter-text and bibliographic references coming
from the LaTeX document (originally produced from Org --> LaTeX) when
using Pandoc. I want to know: are you using Pandoc for this too?
Otherwise, I get nice inter-text references and can tweak the format if
I take the Org export + LaTeXMLMath + OTT (template for ODT) --> ODT,
but then I get no bibliograhpy. Is this the case for you too? If not,
can you tell me how you solved this? (that is why I wanted to know if
you are using Pandoc). Thanks!
I am afraid that by using another way of
exporting math. (Mathjax, Mathml...) I will not get the natural
deductions
proofs that I get via proof.sty.
Yes, I think that has been my experience with other packages. You may
want to get in touch with the people from LaTeXML to see if they can
support proof.sty. In any case, there seems to be no immediate solution.
(The export to odt or docx seems to be a
real nightmare, and that is not very surprising, because LaTeX is the
only
good solution...)
I agree on the nightmare! I made a bug (enhancement) report on
LibreOffice to see if they can help with this. May be it would help if
you add your "I want this too" :) . Also, consider that, when exporting
to ODT, it's most likely because you are working with someone who does
not care too much about the nice side of LaTeX. I would also advise you
to consider loosing part of your format in your document. Instead of
using \myformattingcommand{arg 1}{arg 2} which would produce a nice
\frac{arg 1}{arg 2} in LaTeX, just replace your text for 1/2. They don't
care!
Best wishes,
Jo.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/attachments/20180519/e5191408/attachment.html>
This link leads nowhere.
Having said all of this, I would like to ask the Org team to consider
the next two improvements for the ODT export:
1. Support the \printbibliography[heading=none] LaTeX command (I am away
from my computer right now, and cannot tell if it works without
[heading=none]).
2. Support Org --> MathML with LaTeX packages (as compared to exporting
with ImageMagick, MathToWeb or LaTeXML).
Salut!
-------------------------------------------------
ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the
NSA's hands!
$24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features!
15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas!
Commercial and Bulk Mail Options!
