Sebastian Rose <sebastian_r...@gmx.de> writes: > docbook is great since it's widely used.
Yes, DocBook has been adopted by many organizations in different areas in the past years. Once we have a good exporter for DocBook, we basically build a bridge for exporting Org files to all other formats. > The output looks good! > > How could we test it? > And could we configure it somehow? On how to set up a DocBook publishing environment, you can take a look at the following page: http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/ToolsSetup.html I used xsltproc + FOP before, but now I use Saxon + FOP. > Anyway, I'd prefere to export to _one_ XML format from Org-mode and > provide xslt stylesheets to translate between different formats. I totally agree! We only need one XML exporter, and I think DocBook is the way to go. Baoqiu > That way we all would concentrate on one XML exporter (e.g. the XHTML > exporter) and could provide xslt stylesheets to transform the output. > > This would guaranty a slitely more complete and bugfree export, which is > configured from one org-publish-project-alist. > > Regards, > > Sebastian > > > > Dale Smith <da...@vxitech.com> writes: >> Baoqiu Cui <cbao...@yahoo.com> writes: >> >>> The only thing that is missing (at least to me) in current Org-mode is >>> the exporter for DocBook format. >> >> There is quite a bit of similarity between org and muse formats. I've >> found that I can edit .muse files in org-mode and stiil publish to >> docbook. >> >> >>> During the last week (mainly during the last weekend), I wrote some code >>> to export Org files to DocBook V5.0 format, and everything looks very >>> promising (I have to admit that a lot of work still needs to be done to >>> make the code complete and stable) . >> >> Looks pretty good to me. I'm ready to ty it out! >> >> -Dale _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
