Hello, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:57 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> > wrote: > >> What is exactly the feature you are missing? Your example is a special >> case where _no_ heading is numbered. > > > I would not consider this as a special case. It is very common for HTML > exports to not always number the headings. I didn't say it was an unusual case. I said it didn't cover all the use-cases. Maybe you are really needing a subset of the initial feature. IOW, do mixed numbered/unnumbered headings make sense in TOC? >> 1. it makes all export back-ends consistent with TOC; >> > > I understand that. But would like a way to get back the earlier behavior > too. Then there is the other way around: how do we tell LaTeX to include both numbered and unnumbered headings? And: how do we distinguish @unnumberedsec from @heading in Texinfo? > That way if the file has: > > #+OPTIONS: num:nil > > No TOC will be exported (even though the org-export-with-toc default is t). > > But if the file has: > > #+OPTIONS: num:nil toc:4 > > As the toc value is a number, the TOC will be exported even though num is > nil. AFAICT, this doesn't solve any of the two concerns. What we can do for "num:nil toc:4" can be done for "num:nil" alone. Regards,
