Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:27 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> > wrote: > >> The change was intended. The idea was discussed on the ML. You may want >> to check the thread. >> >> This is on par with, e.g., what LaTeX does. >> > > What would be a good way, though, to bring back that functionality? I don't > mind if I need to set extra options/variables for that.
What is exactly the feature you are missing? Your example is a special case where _no_ heading is numbered. But we also had to deal with situations where only _some_ headings were numbered. In any case, this change solves two problems: 1. it makes all export back-ends consistent with TOC; 2. it allows to use, e.g., @heading instead of @unnumberedsec in Texinfo export. Thus, we don't need to provide a way to determine which one should be used. I admit the second point is probably only convenient for the lazy me: I don't have to find a proper way to support @heading commands in Texinfo export anymore. Regards,
