Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> writes: > Won't using a numeric prefix argument change the behavior for both > interactive and Lisp calls? > > As examples, > > * M-1 M-x org-sort-list is currently interpreted as a non-nil value > for WITH-CASE. Instead, it would be indistinguishable from M-x > org-sort-list. > > * A Lisp caller can currently set WITH-CASE to any non-nil value. > Using (interactive "p") for WITH-CASE, how do we distinguish a > numeric argument passed for WITH-CASE from an interactive call?
OK. It seems I was pretty much confused. > Using an additional argument whose only purpose is to serve as a > interactive flag, which is what called-interactively-p's docstring > suggests, avoids these issues. I'd rather avoid this. What about using (not (or executing-kbd-macro noninteractive)) then, and not touch to signature? Regards,
