Hello, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> writes:
> William Denton <w...@pobox.com> writes: > >> On 5 December 2015, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> >>> However, this report raises an interesting question about footnotes: >>> should we still support plain (e.g., "[1]") footnotes in Org documents? >>> >>> The pattern is very common an regularly introduces false positives. >>> Also, IIRC, it was introduced for non-Org buffers (e.g., in Message mode >>> buffers), to provide some common features with "footnote.el" library. >>> >>> I think we could remove this kind of footnotes, and yet preserve >>> `org-footnote-normalize' to change Org footnotes into these ones, for >>> foreign documents. >> >> +1. The false positives are a common problem for me, and [fn:1] works >> cleanly >> and clearly. > > Same here. +1. Thanks for the feedback. I'll send a patch to the ML by the end of the next week. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
