Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > However, this report raises an interesting question about footnotes: > should we still support plain (e.g., "[1]") footnotes in Org documents? > > The pattern is very common an regularly introduces false positives. > Also, IIRC, it was introduced for non-Org buffers (e.g., in Message mode > buffers), to provide some common features with "footnote.el" library. > > I think we could remove this kind of footnotes, and yet preserve > `org-footnote-normalize' to change Org footnotes into these ones, for > foreign documents. > > WDYT?
I'd be happy to kill [n] style footnotes. I've had issues with them in the past. Rasmus -- Not everything that goes around comes back around, you know
