Hi Jonas, Jonas Bernoulli <jo...@bernoul.li> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > >> Jonas Bernoulli <jo...@bernoul.li> writes: >> >>> Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >>> >>>> Jonas Bernoulli <jo...@bernoul.li> writes: >>>> >>>>> Thanks. But could you please change it to >>>>> >>>>> (if (or outline-minor-mode orgstruct-mode) >>>>> (call-interactively #'show-children) >>>>> ...) >>>> >>>> You could set `orgstruct-mode' to a non-nil value whenever >>>> `outline-minor-mode' is enabled. >>> >>> I could (instead I am currently just maintaining a local patch), >>> but what is the reasoning for not just doing what I suggested? >> >> There is no reason for Org's core to know about `outline-minor-mode', or >> any other minor mode in the wild. > > I wouldn't group `outline-minor-mode' among "any other minor mode > in the wild", after all it was Outline which gave birth to Org and > `outline-minor-mode' is part of `outline.el'. Didn't Carsten write > `outline-magic.el' (containing `outline-cycle') before moving on to > greater things? Unfortunately though `outline-magic.el' does not appear > to have aged so well (at least that's how I remember it from when I last > checked). orgstruct-mode is a mess and we plan to address it. When someone finds the time to do so. Indeed, there was a thread about the issue of org-show-children some time ago. Cheers, Rasmus -- Dung makes an excellent fertilizer
