Hello, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes:
> Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I think the two exporters should use the same syntax! I especially think >> that any future exporters should use a single, unified syntax, and that >> the older exporters should eventualyl be changed to support that new >> syntax. And finally, I think the new syntax should be as simple as >> humanly possible. So I'd like to suggest that the community decide on >> the best way forward. > > We can try to make a common syntax across our exporter, namely ox-desk, > ox-beamer and ox-s5 to the extend that these support "speaker notes". A > "pull request" can then be made to ox-reveal.el, which AFAIK is neither > part of lisp or contrib/lisp. Note that "common syntax" probably means less features (i.e., we are limited to common features). As suggested, I think, it seems better to create a generic export back-end from scratch, which would allow to select a target (e.g., beamer, reveal.js...), than altering current back-ends and enter backward-compatibility's hell. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
