Keith M Swartz <oneroad...@gmail.com> writes:
> Here is an example to reproduce some questionable results:
>
> 0. Create a set of TODO labels, like so:
> #+SEQ_TODO: TODO(!) PEND(!) DONE(!)
>
> 1. Create an item, make it a todo. (Creates a logbook.)
OK.
> 2. Create a subheading. (Alt-Enter, shift-right)
>From where?
> Make it a todo. (This adds a line to the logbook saying the state
> changed to TODO, even though the previous line says the state already
> is TODO. You can't tell which state changed.)
>
> 3. Cycle the state on your sub-todo to PEND. (Changes the state in the
> logbook.)
>
> 4, Go back to the main heading and cycle the state to PEND. (This creates
> ANOTHER logbook right underneath the heading showing the state change. The
> original record for when it was marked TODO is in the other logbook, but
> there are two such entries, and it's not obvious which one is which. You
> could probably infer logically that the older entry is for the main
> heading, but if states keep going back and forth, you'll lose track
> quickly.)
I cannot reproduce this. It creates the following document:
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO(!) PEND(!) DONE(!)
* PEND test
:LOGBOOK:
- State "PEND" from "TODO" [2015-09-04 ven. 21:37]
- State "TODO" from [2015-09-04 ven. 21:33]
:END:
** PEND test2
:LOGBOOK:
- State "PEND" from "TODO" [2015-09-04 ven. 21:35]
- State "TODO" from [2015-09-04 ven. 21:34]
:END:
Regards,
