Hi Christian and all, I'd just like to add a bit of clarification on two points.
"Egli Christian (KIRO 41)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I appreciate the time you took to analyse the problem and propose a > solution. I was just hinting that producing a patch to the documentation > is very easy (in fact that is how I got into hacking on org-mode :-)) Sure, and if anyone *likes* this way of proposing a change, let's go for it! But unless one is 95% sure that the patch is accurate (e.g. when it is a change on typos), I guess it will be enough to send a suggestion -- especially if using diff is more work than anything... > and will IMHO give the developers more time to focus on the code. The > documentation in org.texi is basically text with some markup and can be > adapted easily, so no lisp know-how required. It's been several times that the word "developpers" appeared in its plural form... While I would happily put myself into that category, I think people should bare in mind that I'm only providing patches and suggestions -- and Carsten _is_ the developper ! Having successfully hijacked a mailing list should not be a reason to be held as a "developper". :) -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
