Hi Daniel Daniel Sindler wrote: > On 11/19/2007 12:19 AM, Egli Christian (KIRO 41) wrote: > > Can you try to adapt the relevant text in org.texi (in the distribution > > of org-mode) and produce a patch. This would certainly help a lot to get > > your "problem" fixed.
> I do appreciate that providing a patch is a better solution than > providing information leading to the patch. However, I provided the > relevant section and valid option values in the hope that someone > who knows better could derive a patch faster and more easily than I > can. As it was, I took time to determine experimentally, what the > valid values were since, to me, reading Lisp is about as much fun as > reading a good legal contract. I appreciate the time you took to analyse the problem and propose a solution. I was just hinting that producing a patch to the documentation is very easy (in fact that is how I got into hacking on org-mode :-)) and will IMHO give the developers more time to focus on the code. The documentation in org.texi is basically text with some markup and can be adapted easily, so no lisp know-how required. > > If you need any help on producing a patch let me know. > Yes, I'd greatly appreciate help. Bastien gave a better explanation than I could have ever done. HTH Chtistian _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
