>>> I think using LOGGING is a bit better. >> >> So what do I do? More votes? > > If you want to start using the facility for generally overriding Lisp > values, then your original proposal is better. But if this is just going > to be for a few exceptions, LOGGING fits much better with the > present scheme and docs.
Granted. But to some respect Org has its own definition of 'options' (like startup options) and I think it's clearer for users to be offered to use these Org options first. A general mechanism to set org-log-done for each subtree looks nice, but then the user will be able to mix org-log-done in its main config, lognotedone in the startup options, and org-log-done for some trees. Good for advanced users, maybe slightly confusing for others. (I know it's bad practice to speak for "others" so I won't rely/dwell on this too much... others can speak for themselves!) -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
