Bastien schrieb: > Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I think using LOGGING is a bit better. >> So what do I do? More votes? >> >>> | logging | record a timestamp when an item is marked DONE >>> | nologging | don't record when items are marked DONE >>> | lognotedone | record timestamp and a note when DONE >>> | lognotestate | record timestamp and a note when TODO state >>> | logrepeat | record a note when re-instating a repeating item >>> | nologrepeat | do not record when re-instating repeating item >>> | lognoteclock-out | record timestamp and a note when clocking out > > Well.. if we can access all these options thru a single :LOGGING: > property, that's another argument for it, no? For instance, using a > property :org-log-done: wouldn't let us use nologrepeat, for example. >
I'd also like to vote for :LOGGING: rainer _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
