Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think using LOGGING is a bit better. > > So what do I do? More votes? > >> | logging | record a timestamp when an item is marked DONE >> | nologging | don't record when items are marked DONE >> | lognotedone | record timestamp and a note when DONE >> | lognotestate | record timestamp and a note when TODO state >> | logrepeat | record a note when re-instating a repeating item >> | nologrepeat | do not record when re-instating repeating item >> | lognoteclock-out | record timestamp and a note when clocking out
Well.. if we can access all these options thru a single :LOGGING: property, that's another argument for it, no? For instance, using a property :org-log-done: wouldn't let us use nologrepeat, for example. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
