Wayne, as I understand the situation western junipers in the northern Great
Basin are a native species once "managed" by naturally recurring wildfires.
Fire control has allowed this species to increase in density and occurrence,
dominating landscapes where it was once only spotty and localized.  I'm sure
there are other instances where human intervention has resulted in
unintentional changes to native species mixes and relationships.  In this
case, junipers are not really invasive on a landscape scale since they were
long time natives -- maybe "intrusive" would be a better descriptor.

Warren W. Aney.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wayne Tyson
Sent: 12 September, 2011 06:41
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] a non Ivory Tower view of invasive species

Warren (and others), how might the juniper "invasion" on Steen's Mountain
(or other "invasions" of indigenous species, particularly dominant,
long-lived indicators) fit into this discussion?

WT


----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren W. Aney" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] a non Ivory Tower view of invasive species


I was speaking from a contemporary perspective, Manuel.  From a very long
term perspective perhaps we can say that a species that somehow translocated
into another ecosystem may have initially disrupted that ecosystem but after
a few thousand generations the species and the ecosystem evolved together to
form a coherent and mutually productive stability. There is a hypothesis
that Native Americans disrupted the American ecosystems resulting in the
extinction of several large mammal species shortly after their arrival.  But
after a few thousand generations it appears that they became a component of
the American ecosystems, sometimes managing certain ecosystem elements to
their benefit but certainly not disrupting and degrading these systems to
the extent that Euro-Americans did (and continue to do so).

Taking your island fauna example, consider the Galapagos finches.  Charles
Darwin concluded that there was probably a single invasion of a finch
species eons ago, but these finches evolved into different species so as to
fill various ecological niches, resulting in a diverse and stable set of
finch-inhabited ecosystems.  Certainly introduced rats could also eventually
evolve along with the ecosystems to become a stable component.  But in the
short term that ecosystem is going to be disrupted, and in the long term
that ecosystem is going to be a somewhat different system.  We humans, as
"overseers" have the ability and duty to evaluate that current disruption
and that future potential.  There are those of us who say "let nature take
its course" and there are those who say "manage for human values" - I say we
should be following the axiom of Aldo Leopold: "A thing is right when it
tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic
community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise."  We need to evaluate and
manage invaders with that axiom as our beacon.



Warren W. Aney
Tigard, Oregon



  _____

From: Manuel Spínola [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, 11 September, 2011 04:54
To: Warren W. Aney
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] a non Ivory Tower view of invasive species



Hi Warren,



Take an island, you have "native" birds and later in time you have black
rats that you consider invaders, but why those "native" birds are in the
island, they needed to be invaders at some point in time.



If Homo sapiens originated in Africa, from where the native Americans are
from?



Best,



Manuel



2011/9/10 Warren W. Aney <[email protected]>

There can be a meaningful ecological difference between an organism that
evolved with an ecosystem and an organism that evolved outside of but
spread, migrated or was otherwise introduced into that ecosystem.  An
organism that evolved with an ecosystem is considered a component that
characterizes that ecosystem.  An introduced organism that did not evolve
with that ecosystem should at least be evaluated for its potential modifying
effects on that ecosystem.

Am I being too simplistic?

Warren W. Aney
Senior Wildlife Ecologist
Tigard, OR

-----Original Message-----
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Manuel Spínola
Sent: Saturday, 10 September, 2011 12:22
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] a non Ivory Tower view of invasive species


With all due respect, are not we all invaders at some point in time?

Best,

Manuel Spínola

2011/9/10 David L. McNeely <[email protected]>

> ---- Matt Chew <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > We can compose effectively endless lists of cases where human agency has
> > redistributed biota and thereby affected pre-existing populations,
> > ecological relationships and traditional or potential economic
> > opportunities.  Those are indisputable facts.
>
> The House Sparrow is in North America by human hand.
>
>
> > But what those facts mean is disputable.
>
> House sparrows are in serious decline in Europe, probably as an unintended
> consequence due to human actions.
> >
> > I see effects; they see impacts.
> > I see change; they see damage.
>
> Many people see a need to eradicate non-natives.  At the same time, many
> people see a need to preserve natives.
>
> With regard to the house sparrow ------ hmmm......... .
>
> Where does the "arms race" that Matt mentioned further along in his post
> lead?
>
> mcneely
>
> >
>



--
*Manuel Spínola, Ph.D.*
Instituto Internacional en Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre
Universidad Nacional
Apartado 1350-3000
Heredia
COSTA RICA
[email protected]
[email protected]
Teléfono: (506) 2277-3598
Fax: (506) 2237-7036

Personal website: Lobito de río <https://sites.google.com/site/lobitoderio/>
Institutional website: ICOMVIS <http://www.icomvis.una.ac.cr/>







-- 
Manuel Spínola, Ph.D.
Instituto Internacional en Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre
Universidad Nacional
Apartado 1350-3000
Heredia
COSTA RICA
[email protected]
[email protected]
Teléfono: (506) 2277-3598
Fax: (506) 2237-7036
Personal website: Lobito de río <https://sites.google.com/site/lobitoderio/>

Institutional website: ICOMVIS <http://www.icomvis.una.ac.cr/>


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3890 - Release Date: 09/11/11

Reply via email to