On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 18:48, Matt Coster <matt.cos...@imgtec.com> wrote: > > On 03/06/2025 13:27, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 00:24, Michal Wilczynski > > <m.wilczyn...@samsung.com> wrote: > >> > >> Add a device tree node for the IMG BXM-4-64 GPU present in the T-HEAD > >> TH1520 SoC used by the Lichee Pi 4A board. This node enables support for > >> the GPU using the drm/imagination driver. > >> > >> By adding this node, the kernel can recognize and initialize the GPU, > >> providing graphics acceleration capabilities on the Lichee Pi 4A and > >> other boards based on the TH1520 SoC. > >> > >> Add fixed clock gpu_mem_clk, as the MEM clock on the T-HEAD SoC can't be > >> controlled programatically. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczyn...@samsung.com> > >> --- > >> arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi > >> b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi > >> index > >> 6170eec79e919b606a2046ac8f52db07e47ef441..ee937bbdb7c08439a70306f035b1cc82ddb4bae2 > >> 100644 > >> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi > >> @@ -225,6 +225,13 @@ aonsys_clk: clock-73728000 { > >> #clock-cells = <0>; > >> }; > >> > >> + gpu_mem_clk: mem-clk { > >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >> + clock-frequency = <0>; > >> + clock-output-names = "gpu_mem_clk"; > >> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >> + }; > >> + > >> stmmac_axi_config: stmmac-axi-config { > >> snps,wr_osr_lmt = <15>; > >> snps,rd_osr_lmt = <15>; > >> @@ -504,6 +511,21 @@ clk: clock-controller@ffef010000 { > >> #clock-cells = <1>; > >> }; > >> > >> + gpu: gpu@ffef400000 { > >> + compatible = "thead,th1520-gpu", > >> "img,img-bxm-4-64", > >> + "img,img-rogue"; > >> + reg = <0xff 0xef400000 0x0 0x100000>; > >> + interrupt-parent = <&plic>; > >> + interrupts = <102 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > >> + clocks = <&clk_vo CLK_GPU_CORE>, > >> + <&gpu_mem_clk>, > >> + <&clk_vo CLK_GPU_CFG_ACLK>; > >> + clock-names = "core", "mem", "sys"; > >> + power-domains = <&aon TH1520_GPU_PD>; > >> + power-domain-names = "a"; > > > > If the power-domain-names are really needed, please pick a > > useful/descriptive name. > > This isn't the first time our unfortunate power domain names have come > up [1][2]. Sadly, we're stuck with them for Rogue.
Wow, that's really crazy. BTW, are there any reasons why you can't rely on attaching them by index instead, via dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id() for example? Thus entirely drop the names in the DT docs? It sounds like the names don't really have a meaning, or do they? > > Matt > > [1]: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/ff4e96e4-ebc2-4c50-9715-82ba3d7b8...@imgtec.com/ > [2]: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/cc6a19b3-ba35-465c-9fa6-a764df7c0...@imgtec.com/ > > > [...] Kind regards Uffe