2010/7/26 Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5 at gmail.com>: > W dniu 26 lipca 2010 20:55 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher > <alexdeucher at gmail.com> napisa?: >> 2010/7/26 Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5 at gmail.com>: >>> W dniu 26 lipca 2010 07:57 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher >>> <alexdeucher at gmail.com> napisa?: >>>> How about v4 (attached)? ?Any better? >>> >>> I counted up to 9 flashes after resume this time. Didn't try this >>> again (maybe different amount of flashses). >> >> I've broken it down into 6 patches available here: >> http://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/reduce_emit/ > > Thanks for this splitting your patch! > > I got lock up after applying 0001 and 0002. I fixed it with attached > half-revert-patch. Didn't experiment with 0003 - 0006 yet.
Weird we shouldn't need the sampler state as we emit that later based on the source surface we are copying. Can you try with all patches both with and without the sampler emit put back? Alex
