On 14.2.2012, at 5.19, Michael M Slusarz wrote: >> b login (SAVEDSTATE 1234567890) user pass > > I guess the drawback for this approach is that you are explicitly breaking > the LOGIN definition.
No breaking, extending :) > And you don't allow reviving the state if using the AUTHENTICATE command. Just as easy: b authenticate (savedstate ..) plain .. > The alternative would be to have an additional pre-authentication command > that sets the desired state. But that adds the overhead of sending/parsing > another command. Yeah. Although not bad either, since you can pipeline that command + login/authenticate.
