On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 08:29 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > > Another thing I was thinking about previously was that in process lists > > they were prefixed with dovecot/. So the binary names could be lda, > > imap-login, etc. but they'd show up in process lists as dovecot/lda, > > dovecot/imap-login, etc. > > > > > seems like more work for no reason, just call the binary dovecot-lda > etc, makes it easier if you get someone not familiar with dovecot trying > to locate it, having a temper tantrum with dovecot-lda showing up but > unable to locate that binary :)
If I used dovecot/lda process name, then there would be $lib/dovecot/lda binary also, not dovecot-lda.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
