Hi Terry,

> > http://hadrian-way.co.uk/Misc/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T%2E is good background and has as
table.

>   9 Power_On_Hours          -O--CK   092   092   000    -    6039

That's not very long.

    $ units 6039hours time
            251 day + 15 hr

>  12 Power_Cycle_Count       -O--CK   100   100   000    -    598
> 193 Load_Cycle_Count        -O--CK   199   199   000    -    4681

Doesn't look too unreasonable.

    $ units 6039hours/598 time
            10 hr + 5 min + 55.183946 sec
    $ units 6039hours/4681 time
            1 hr + 17 min + 24.392224 sec

>   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   PO--CK   200   200   140    -    0

The drive has never remapped one sector it found hard to read to
another.  That's good, but...

> 196 Reallocated_Event_Count -O--CK   198   198   000    -    2

Two attempts, successful or not, to remap a sector.

> 197 Current_Pending_Sector  -O--CK   199   199   000    -    310

310 sectors that haven't yet been read successfully.  If that's
achieved, e.g. ddrescue(1), or the sector is written, e.g. having
badblocks write to the device if you don't care for the drive's data,
then it can be remapped.

> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable   ----CK   199   199   000    -    294

294 read or write errors that couldn't be corrected, e.g. ECC.

> 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    -O--CK   200   200   000    -    0

No interface CRC errors detected.

> 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate   ---R--   197   197   051    -    434

434 write errors.

Changes in these numbers over time and usage give an indication of if
it's degrading and how quickly.  That's why I log them daily.

> Error 1063  [6]  6028 hours (251 days + 4 hours)   UNC           at LBA = 
> 0x0352f58c = 55768460
> Error 1062  [5]  6028 hours (251 days + 4 hours)   UNC 8 sectors at LBA = 
> 0x0352e5f8 = 55764472
> Error 1061  [4]  6028 hours (251 days + 4 hours)   UNC           at LBA = 
> 0x0352e5fd = 55764477
> Error 1060  [3]  6028 hours (251 days + 4 hours)   UNC 8 sectors at LBA = 
> 0x0352e5f8 = 55764472
> Error 1059  [2]  6028 hours (251 days + 4 hours)   UNC           at LBA = 
> 0x0352e5fd = 55764477
> Error 1058  [1]  6028 hours (251 days + 4 hours)   UNC 8 sectors at LBA = 
> 0x0352cdf8 = 55758328
> Error 1057  [0]  6028 hours (251 days + 4 hours)   UNC           at LBA = 
> 0x0352cdff = 55758335
> Error 1056 [23]  6028 hours (251 days + 4 hours)   UNC 8 sectors at LBA = 
> 0x0352cdf8 = 55758328

These uncorrectables are probably your badblocks reading every sector.
The few errors still in the SMART logs are close together on disk.

> I came across a bug posted about three years ago about smartctl
> throwing up false read errors

Do you mean badblocks?

> > > We won't need all of the 1 TB of space for our purposes, so could
> > > we partition the least bad part of the disc and use it?
> > 
> > If the errors are constrained to a clear part to avoid.
>
> There were just over 1000 badblocks reported, so not a huge amount in
> comparison to a 1 TB drive.

It depends how scattered through the disk they are.  But really, push
the problem down to the drive.  Allow it to reallocate those sectors it
knows are duff but writing to them; easy if the drive's contents are
worthless by employing badblocks' destructive write test.

Then the SMART data should show lots of reallocations and the drive
won't have any uncorrectable sectors, for a while, so your partitions
don't have anywhere to avoid.

> I presume it would try to mirror the whole thing, since that is what
> is would expect to do.

But this is a ‘new’ drive being added to the existing one to make an
array so it will be the destination of the mirroring and have lots
written to it?  It's only the reading of it, e.g. a regular ‘scrub’ that
will show problems.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.

-- 
  Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2019-07-02 20:00
  Check to whom you are replying
  Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ...  http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
  New thread, don't hijack:  mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk

Reply via email to