Same thing, automate.

Unit tests and functional tests FTW.

Granted it takes some time to write but the effort is worth it ans it's a
sane habit to have.

Check out the module template I maintain for a starting point :
https://github.com/Dolibarr/dolibarr-module-template

Yes, I have a blog post in the works about that but I'm too busy with
paying jobs at the moment.

Le 19 oct. 2016 4:50 PM, "Charles Benke" <charles...@benke.fr> a écrit :

> Actually I maintain 22 modules, some are simple, some are complex. To test
> all of them correctly (use all feature, modify doc, …) each time a new
> major version of Dolibarr is release is more than 2 full weeks long for
> Romain an me...
>
> During the month a new version comes out, sales of modules on dolistore
> are halved cut (according to my information it is not related to my modules
> only).
>
>
>
> I could do as some others … , just change the version number and wait for
> my clients put bugs me but I do not find it honest
>
>
>
> Most integrators with whom I work no longer wish to upgrade versions as
> there are no major advances between two versions either-called major
>
> The final version of each major costs money and energy to NOTHING: just to
> show that development teams are able to release two versions per year, two
> versions full of vacuum .
>
>
>
> We have all been waiting for new accountancy module for 2 years. The time
> spent to release a new version will have better been employed to work on
> this strategic module…
>
>
>
>
>
> Bien cordialement,
>
> Charlie Benke
>
>
>
> *De :* Dolibarr-dev [mailto:dolibarr-dev-bounces+charles.fr=
> benke...@nongnu.org] *De la part de* Developpement | Open-DSI
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 19 octobre 2016 16:24
> *À :* Posts about Dolibarr ERP & CRM development and coding <
> dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org>
> *Cc :* dolibarr-associat...@nongnu.org
> *Objet :* Re: [Dolibarr-dev] [Dolibarr-association] Dolibarr 4.0.1
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks to Camille for pointing the main problem : Module and ratio time
> spend / bug / patch
> As integrator of Dolibarr, it's not "sustainable" for me to test every six
> month Dolibarr and the modules I'm commonly using. Today I only install
> 3.9. Maybe next year, I will uprade to 5.0 or not... depending of what
> functions will be added or remaining experimental.
> Modules are too often broken by new version. On the Dolistore you can see
> module labeled 3.x-4.0 who are in fact broken with the last version or
> doesn't exist for the current version of Dolibarr. I think it's not good
> for the reputation of Dolibarr.
> I'll be pleased to discuss about this subject in Valence :-)
>
> Regards
> Philippe Scoffoni - Open-DSI
>
>
> Le 19/10/2016 à 15:14, cam.la...@azerttyu.net a écrit :
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> Thanks for sharing this.
>
> I agree, Dolibarr migration is pretty nice !
>
>
>
> but only core part, modules looks more problematic to update.
>
>
>
> Regarding communication, this is a work in progress.
>
>
>
> Yes I saw this :) But looks again difficult. But it's better :)
>
>
>
> From now on, we'll have systematic annoucement when a major version is
> released, minor version too, why not. A communication group has been
> started within the fundation with the goal to better communicate with the
> community. We already are present on social medias, but this dev
> mailing-list and the dolistore customers are 2 audiences we poorly
> communicate with (not to say not at all).
>
>
>
> I don't understand logic, dolibarr users/community are on forum,
> mailinglist but piority is social network, strange
>
>
>
> About your concerns around PRs and plugins, I'm sorry you feel that way.
> PRs are usually correctly integrated and not lost.
>
>
>
> Maybe now, I'll try again. But I'm not sure. My fear is to lost again
> energy to nothing.
>
>
>
> Plugins are the responsibility of their developers. Personnaly, our
> plugins are upgraded with the new releases
>
>
>
> I'm not module developper then I don't know if is complicate or not to
> follow release and provide. As user, i prefer to have my own script and
> don't use module. In my use case ratio time spend / bug / patch is too
> heavy.
>
> Thanks a lot
>
>
>
> km
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
>
> Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dolibarr-dev mailing list
> Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>
>

-- 
 <https://gpcsolutions.fr>
https://gpcsolutions.fr
Technopole Hélioparc
2 avenue du Président Pierre Angot
64053 PAU CEDEX 9
SARL GPC.solutions au capital de 7 500 € - R.C.S. PAU 528 995 921
<http://wiki.dolibarr.org/index.php/Dolibarr_suppliers_France#GPC.solutions>
_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev

Répondre à