Hi all,

Regarding the current release management, I (speaking also for ATM) think
that having 2 releases per year is a very good thing.
This shows community members that Dolibarr is very active, users that the
project is very much alive and that they don't have to wait for more than a
year to have a new functionality.

On the development side, we strongly think that short delays between
releases is the best because the beta stage is reduced and so are the
bugfix. The more new things you have to test and fix, the longer and harder
this will be. There's already a lack of testers and bugfixers, so having
more for them will be discouraging.

Finally, I don't see where the developer creativity is reduced with this
system.

Of course I (again we at ATM) are open to discussion, especially when you
will visit us in Valence on December 9/10/11 ;)

Bien cordialement,

--
*Maxime Kohlhaas* | Consultant associé
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tél : 06 33 42 92 43

2016-10-17 18:38 GMT+02:00 The mailing-list for Dolibarr foundation members
<dolibarr-associat...@nongnu.org>:

> Hello
>
> I agree with Charlie and not only for creativity reason.
> I think this point as to be debated to the next devcamp in Valencia.
>
> Regards
>
> Philippe Scoffoni
>
>
> Le 15/10/2016 à 14:51, Charles Benke a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> 10 years is a good year to change his use, be more adult …
>
> 5.0 is a REAL major version IF they include as stable multicurancy and
> accountancy
>
> In other case they will be another disturbish version who decrease the
> number of sell in the Dolistore.
>
> 6 month between 2 major version freeze the creativity of developpers, We
> have waiting 3 years to have the accountancy stable in Dolibarr and without
> the crownfunding of darkjeff, I suppose that we have to wait 3 years more
> this major feature …
>
>
>
> Once again I ask to change the scheduling of the major release to 1 by
> year and I propose to plan a vote for change the roadmap ASAP
>
>
>
> Bien cordialement,
>
> Charlie Benke
>
>
>
> *De :* Dolibarr-association [mailto:dolibarr-association-
> bounces+charles.fr=benke...@nongnu.org
> <dolibarr-association-bounces+charles.fr=benke...@nongnu.org>] *De la
> part de* The mailing-list for Dolibarr foundation members
> *Envoyé :* samedi 15 octobre 2016 11:47
> *À :* ML Dolibarr dev <dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org> <dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org>;
> ML Dolibarr Foundation <dolibarr-associat...@nongnu.org>
> <dolibarr-associat...@nongnu.org>
> *Objet :* [Dolibarr-association] Dolibarr 4.0.1
>
>
>
> Hi.
>
> Just a note to let you know that dolibarr 4.0.1 has been released.
> 4.0.1 is just a very minor bugfix version compared to 4.0 to fix issues
> discovered just after release of the major version 4.0
>
> The current development branch should also be frozen soon to start the 5.0
> beta period. Goal is to release 5.0 in january as stated in the roadmap we
> follow from 10 years now (1 major version in january and 1 in july)
>
> Version can be downloaded from official portal https://www.dolibarr.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dolibarr-dev mailing 
> listDolibarr-dev@nongnu.orghttps://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
>
>
>

-- 
 <http://www.atm-consulting.fr>
_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev

Répondre à