https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70025
--- Comment #8 from Philippe Cloutier <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #7) Thank you for the explanation/confirmation > The danger of changing that file name to something else is that > troubleshooting a server becomes a guessing game of where the configuration > might be hiding. That's why we have consistently encouraged people (on irc > and on the users mailing list) not to do this. So suggesting in the doc that > someone do this seems unkind. Obviously, every change to default configuration makes behavior harder to understand, but I did not read the example as a *suggestion*. I read it as an illustration of how it behaves. FWIW, I would have found an example using several (2) names more interesting, as that is the most complicated case to understand. If that directive is considered "dangerous", I would prefer a section with 1 example and 1 warning against overriding to a section without any of these. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
