https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70025
--- Comment #4 from Philippe Cloutier <[email protected]> --- Thank you Rich Your change solves the case which I reported, but I am concerned the addition about the default stanza introduces a similar issue. I asked about that in the GitHub’s page for the commit. (In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #3) > Also removed the example of setting AccessFileName to a non-standard value. > Documentation should not only describe functionality but also recommend best > practice — suggesting that people rename their distributed configuration > files serves no purpose other than making troubleshooting harder for > everyone involved. I agree that documentation can describe best practice, but I do not understand the example as a suggestion. Examples illustrate descriptions, and I for one pretty much believe every non-trivial (boolean) setting should have an example, unless perhaps the setting is dangerous/deprecated. httpd documentation contains completely fabricated examples which are not suggestions at all. I can see reasons to use AccessFileName, in particular the unclear default and the lack of l10n. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
